Who is better, Engquist or Thompson-Herah?
Ludmila Engquist leads with a GOAT score of 85.1 against 85.1 for Elaine Thompson-Herah — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ludmila Engquist and Elaine Thompson-Herah level at 85.1. Ludmila Engquist leads on Longevity. Elaine Thompson-Herah leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Engquist wins: Longevity
Thompson-Herah wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ludmila-engquist-vs-thompson-herah
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Engquist leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Engquist | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 15 |
| 🇯🇲 Thompson-Herah | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.25 | 75.3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EngquistRetired | Thompson-HerahActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| European titles | 1 | — |
| 100 m hurdles personal best | 12.26 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | 5 |
| Olympic golds | — | 5 |
| Olympic medals | — | 6 |
| 100 m personal best | — | 10.54 |
| 200 m personal best | — | 21.53 |
| Sprint doubles at Games | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteLudmila Engquist leads with a GOAT score of 85.1 against 85.1 for Elaine Thompson-Herah — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Thompson-Herah scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Engquist leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Engquist: 85.1, Thompson-Herah: 85.1.
Make your case for Engquist vs Thompson-Herah. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.