Who is better, Formanová or Baldini?
Ludmila Formanová leads with a GOAT score of 84.3 against 84.3 for Stefano Baldini — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ludmila Formanová and Stefano Baldini level at 84.3. Ludmila Formanová leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Stefano Baldini leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Formanová wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Baldini wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ludmila-formanova-vs-stefano-baldini
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Formanová leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Formanová | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 210 | 632 |
| 🇮🇹 Baldini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 11 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FormanováRetired | BaldiniRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| World Indoor titles | 1 | — |
| World indoor records | 1 | — |
| Personal best in seconds | 11,733 | — |
| European medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Marathon personal best in hours | — | 2.07 |
| Career marathons | — | 26 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Ludmila Formanová leads with a GOAT score of 84.3 against 84.3 for Stefano Baldini — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baldini scores higher on longevity. Formanová leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Formanová: 84.3, Baldini: 84.3.
Make your case for Formanová vs Baldini. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.