Who is better, Dončić or Guerin?
Richie Guerin leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.5 for Luka Dončić — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Richie Guerin above Luka Dončić: 81.6 vs 81.5. Richie Guerin leads on Longevity, Honours. Luka Dončić leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Guerin wins: Longevity, Honours
Dončić wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/luka-doncic-vs-richie-guerin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Guerin leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇮 Dončić | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 172.4 |
| 🇺🇸 Guerin | 0 | 0 | 4.9 | 16.8 | 55.6 | 160.3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DončićActive · Los Angeles Lakers | GuerinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-NBA First Team | 5 | — |
| Scoring titles | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 6 | 6 |
| EuroLeague titles | 1 | — |
| Triple-doubles | 80 | — |
| Points per game | 28.6 | — |
| All-NBA selections | — | 3 |
| Career points | — | 14,676 |
| Career assists | — | 4,211 |
| Coach of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Richie Guerin leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.5 for Luka Dončić — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dončić scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Guerin leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Dončić: 81.5, Guerin: 81.6.
Make your case for Dončić vs Guerin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.