GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Buldakova vs Fabiana

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FabianaWinner
89.8

Fabiana wins: Longevity

Buldakova
89.6

Buldakova wins: Peak

Candidates
Locked to Volleyball

Shareable URL · /compare/lyudmila-buldakova-vs-fabiana-alvim

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇷 Fabiana Alvim
89.8

Fabiana leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Two-time Olympic champion with Brazil in 2008 and 2012.

1. Fabiana Alvim
89.8
2. Lyudmila Buldakova
89.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇷🇺 Lyudmila Buldakova5 seasons played · career day 1,826360 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇷 Fabiana Alvim5 seasons played · career day 1,825326 titles
-9.4% vs Buldakova at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇷🇺 Buldakova0060126276717
🇧🇷 Fabiana0055115326680

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBuldakovaRetiredFabianaRetired
Olympic gold medals22
Olympic medals3
World Championship gold medals2
European titles4
Soviet league titles6
World Grand Prix titles7
World Cup medals2
Brazilian league titles5
Olympic appearances3
Dominance w25%8888
Peak w20%9493
Longevity w20%8486
Honours w20%9494
Statistics w15%8888

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Fabiana89.8
Buldakova89.6
The people
Buldakova
Fabiana

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Buldakova vs Fabiana. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →