Who is better, Ma Long or Waldner?
Ma Long leads with a GOAT score of 97.3 against 94.1 for Jan-Ove Waldner — a gap of 3.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ma Long above Jan-Ove Waldner: 97.3 vs 94.1. Ma Long leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics. Jan-Ove Waldner leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ma Long wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Waldner wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ma-long-vs-waldner
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ma Long leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
Waldner is -100.0% behind Ma Long's pace at age 21
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Ma Long leads with a GOAT score of 97.3 against 94.1 for Jan-Ove Waldner — a gap of 3.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Waldner scores higher on longevity. Ma Long leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ma Long: 97.3, Waldner: 94.1.
Make your case for Ma Long vs Waldner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.