Who is better, Carneiro or Chulak?
Yefim Chulak leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.8 for Macris Carneiro — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yefim Chulak above Macris Carneiro: 83.0 vs 82.8. Yefim Chulak leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Macris Carneiro leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chulak wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Carneiro wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/macris-carneiro-vs-yefim-chulak
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chulak leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Carneiro | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 37 |
| 🇺🇦 Chulak | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 278 | 636 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CarneiroActive | ChulakRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Grand Prix titles | 3 | — |
| Nations League medals | 2 | — |
| Club world titles | 1 | — |
| Brazil caps | 250 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 3 |
| National team years | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Yefim Chulak leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.8 for Macris Carneiro — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Carneiro scores higher on statistics, longevity. Chulak leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carneiro: 82.8, Chulak: 83.0.
Make your case for Carneiro vs Chulak. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.