Who is better, El Khatib or Larsson?
Mahmoud El Khatib leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for Sebastian Larsson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Mahmoud El Khatib and Sebastian Larsson level at 81.2. Mahmoud El Khatib leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Sebastian Larsson leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →El Khatib wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Larsson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/mahmoud-el-khatib-vs-sebastian-larsson-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
El Khatib leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇬 El Khatib | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 30 | 100 |
| 🇸🇪 Larsson | 0 | 0 | 48 | 100 | 282 | 583 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | El KhatibRetired | LarssonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| African Footballer of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Africa Cup of Nations titles | 1 | — |
| Egyptian Premier League titles | 10 | — |
| Al Ahly goals | 108 | — |
| Egypt caps | 74 | — |
| Sweden caps | — | 133 |
| Premier League appearances | — | 300 |
| Swedish titles | — | 2 |
| Sweden goals | — | 10 |
| Major tournaments | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Mahmoud El Khatib leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for Sebastian Larsson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Larsson scores higher on statistics, longevity. El Khatib leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. El Khatib: 81.2, Larsson: 81.2.
Make your case for El Khatib vs Larsson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.