GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Marshall vs Dravid

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MarshallWinner
89.5

Marshall wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Dravid
87.1

Dravid wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/malcolm-marshall-vs-rahul-dravid

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇧 Malcolm Marshall
89.5

Marshall leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. 376 Test wickets at 20.94 — statistically the finest fast bowler in history.

1. Malcolm Marshall
89.5
2. Rahul Dravid
87.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇮🇳 Rahul Dravid5 years played · career day 1,826244 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇧 Malcolm Marshall5 years played · career day 2,19074 runs
-69.7% vs Dravid at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇧🇧 Marshall000341224
🇮🇳 Dravid004086194492

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMarshallRetiredDravidRetired
Test wickets376
Test matches81
Test bowling average20.94
Five-wicket hauls22
ODI wickets157
Test runs13,288
Test centuries36
Test average52.31
ODI runs10,889
Test catches210
Balls faced in Tests31,258
Dominance w25%9284
Peak w20%9488
Longevity w20%8290
Honours w20%8682
Statistics w15%9494

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Marshall89.5
Dravid87.1
The people
Marshall
Dravid

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Marshall vs Dravid. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →