Who is better, Marshall or Chanderpaul?
Malcolm Marshall leads with a GOAT score of 89.5 against 89.4 for Shivnarine Chanderpaul — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Malcolm Marshall above Shivnarine Chanderpaul: 89.5 vs 89.4. Malcolm Marshall leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Shivnarine Chanderpaul leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Marshall wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Chanderpaul wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/malcolm-marshall-vs-shivnarine-chanderpaul
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Marshall leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇧 Marshall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 224 |
| 🇬🇾 Chanderpaul | 0 | 0 | 35 | 74 | 218 | 472 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MarshallRetired | ChanderpaulRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test wickets | 376 | — |
| Test matches | 81 | — |
| Test bowling average | 20.94 | — |
| Five-wicket hauls | 22 | — |
| ODI wickets | 157 | — |
| Test runs | — | 11,867 |
| Tests played | — | 164 |
| Test centuries | — | 30 |
| Batting average | — | 51 |
| ODI runs | — | 8,778 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 96 |
Malcolm Marshall leads with a GOAT score of 89.5 against 89.4 for Shivnarine Chanderpaul — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chanderpaul scores higher on statistics, longevity. Marshall leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Marshall: 89.5, Chanderpaul: 89.4.
Make your case for Marshall vs Chanderpaul. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.