Who is better, Smarzek or Carrillo?
Malwina Smarzek leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Nancy Carrillo — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Malwina Smarzek and Nancy Carrillo level at 81.9. Malwina Smarzek leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Nancy Carrillo leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Smarzek wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Carrillo wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/malwina-smarzek-vs-nancy-carrillo
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Smarzek leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱 Smarzek | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 309 | 654 |
| 🇨🇺 Carrillo | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 230 | 635 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SmarzekActive | CarrilloRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Italian league medals | 2 | — |
| Polish league titles | 2 | — |
| League top-scorer awards | 3 | — |
| National team caps | 100 | — |
| European Championship appearances | 3 | — |
| Pan American medals | — | 2 |
| NORCECA titles | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 3 |
| National team years | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Malwina Smarzek leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Nancy Carrillo — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Carrillo scores higher on longevity. Smarzek leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Smarzek: 81.9, Carrillo: 81.9.
Make your case for Smarzek vs Carrillo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.