GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Safin vs Hingis

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HingisWinner
83.8

Hingis wins: Longevity

Safin
83.7

Safin wins: Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/marat-safin-vs-martina-hingis

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇭 Martina Hingis
83.8

Hingis leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. World No. 1 at 16 and later one of the greatest doubles players ever.

1. Martina Hingis
83.8
2. Marat Safin
83.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇷🇺 Marat Safin5 seasons played · career day 1,825366 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇭 Martina Hingis5 seasons played · career day 2,55635 titles
-90.4% vs Safin at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇷🇺 Safin004099366645
🇨🇭 Hingis00001941

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSafinRetiredHingisRetired
Major singles titles2
ATP titles15
Weeks at world number one9
Davis Cup titles2
Masters titles5
Grand Slam singles titles5
Grand Slam doubles titles13
Weeks at No. 1209
Career singles titles43
Year-end No. 14
Olympic medals1
Dominance w25%8080
Peak w20%9690
Longevity w20%7482
Honours w20%8484
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hingis83.8
Safin83.7
The people
Safin
Hingis

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Safin vs Hingis. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →