Who is better, Acuña or Juárez?
Marcela Acuña leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Mariana Juárez — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Acuña vs Juárez
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Marcela Acuña and Mariana Juárez level at 86.3.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AcuñaWinner
86.3Acuña wins: no category outright
Juárez
86.3Juárez wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/marcela-acuna-vs-mariana-juarez
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇷 Marcela Acuña
86.3
Acuña leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Marcela Acuña
2. Mariana Juárez
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇷 Marcela Acuña5 years played · career day 1,825310 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇲🇽 Mariana Juárez5 years played · career day 1,825300 title wins
-3.2% vs Acuña at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Acuña | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 310 | 652 |
| 🇲🇽 Juárez | 0 | 0 | 48 | 102 | 300 | 636 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Acuña86.3
Juárez86.3
FAQ
Where does Juárez beat Acuña?
Juárez does not lead any of the five categories; Acuña is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Acuña vs Juárez score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Acuña: 86.3, Juárez: 86.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Acuña vs Juárez. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.