Who is better, Arop or Rudolph?
Marco Arop leads with a GOAT score of 81.3 against 81.3 for Wilma Rudolph — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Marco Arop and Wilma Rudolph level at 81.3. Marco Arop leads on Longevity, Statistics. Wilma Rudolph leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Arop wins: Longevity, Statistics
Rudolph wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/marco-arop-vs-wilma-rudolph
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Arop leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Arop | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.44 | 5.76 | 10.02 |
| 🇺🇸 Rudolph | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Marco Arop leads with a GOAT score of 81.3 against 81.3 for Wilma Rudolph — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rudolph scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Arop leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Arop: 81.3, Rudolph: 81.3.
Make your case for Arop vs Rudolph. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.