GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Materazzi vs Lizarazu

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MaterazziWinner
85.5

Materazzi wins: Dominance, Statistics

Lizarazu
85.5

Lizarazu wins: Honours

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/marco-materazzi-v-vs-bixente-lizarazu

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇹 Marco Materazzi
85.5

Materazzi leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World Cup winner and scorer in the 2006 final, and a treble winner with Inter.

1. Marco Materazzi
85.5
2. Bixente Lizarazu
85.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇫🇷 Bixente Lizarazu5 seasons played · career day 1,826296 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Marco Materazzi5 seasons played · career day 1,825293 goals
-1.0% vs Lizarazu at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇮🇹 Materazzi0050104293605
🇫🇷 Lizarazu0050105228616

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMaterazziRetiredLizarazuRetired
World Cup titles11
Serie A titles5
Champions League titles11
Italy caps41
Career goals60
European Championship titles1
Bundesliga titles6
France caps97
Dominance w25%8280
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8484
Honours w20%8892
Statistics w15%8482

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Materazzi85.5
Lizarazu85.5
The people
Materazzi
Lizarazu

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Materazzi vs Lizarazu. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →