GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Materazzi vs Fabinho

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MaterazziWinner
85.5

Materazzi wins: no category outright

Fabinho
85.5

Fabinho wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/marco-materazzi-v-vs-fabinho-v

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇹 Marco Materazzi
85.5

Materazzi leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories. World Cup winner and scorer in the 2006 final, and a treble winner with Inter.

1. Marco Materazzi
85.5
2. Fabinho
85.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇧🇷 Fabinho5 seasons played · career day 1,826311 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Marco Materazzi5 seasons played · career day 1,825293 goals
-5.8% vs Fabinho at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇮🇹 Materazzi0050104293605
🇧🇷 Fabinho0052109238653

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMaterazziRetiredFabinhoActive
World Cup titles1
Serie A titles5
Champions League titles11
Italy caps41
Career goals60
Premier League titles1
Club World Cup titles1
Brazil caps30
Career appearances500
Dominance w25%8282
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8484
Honours w20%8888
Statistics w15%8484

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Materazzi85.5
Fabinho85.5
The people
Materazzi
Fabinho

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Materazzi vs Fabinho. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →