Who is better, Materazzi or Gyökeres?
Marco Materazzi leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.5 for Viktor Gyökeres — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Marco Materazzi and Viktor Gyökeres level at 85.5. Marco Materazzi leads on Longevity, Honours. Viktor Gyökeres leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Materazzi wins: Longevity, Honours
Gyökeres wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/marco-materazzi-v-vs-viktor-gyokeres-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Materazzi leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Materazzi | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 293 | 605 |
| 🇸🇪 Gyökeres | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 235 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MaterazziRetired | GyökeresActive · Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Serie A titles | 5 | — |
| Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| Italy caps | 41 | — |
| Career goals | 60 | 200 |
| European Golden Shoe awards | — | 1 |
| Primeira Liga titles | — | 2 |
| Portuguese league goals | — | 68 |
| Sweden goals | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 92 |
Marco Materazzi leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.5 for Viktor Gyökeres — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gyökeres scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Materazzi leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Materazzi: 85.5, Gyökeres: 85.5.
Make your case for Materazzi vs Gyökeres. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.