Who is better, Verratti or Dembélé?
Marco Verratti leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.7 for Ousmane Dembélé — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Marco Verratti and Ousmane Dembélé level at 87.7. Marco Verratti leads on Longevity. Ousmane Dembélé leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Verratti wins: Longevity
Dembélé wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/marco-verratti-v-vs-ousmane-dembele-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Verratti leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Verratti | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 250 | 675 |
| 🇫🇷 Dembélé | 0 | 0 | 55 | 114 | 315 | 643 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VerrattiActive | DembéléActive |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Ligue 1 titles | 9 | — |
| French cups | 13 | — |
| Italy caps | 65 | — |
| Champions League appearances | 90 | — |
| Ballon d'Or awards | — | 1 |
| Champions League titles | — | 1 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| League titles | — | 7 |
| Career goals | — | 160 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Marco Verratti leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.7 for Ousmane Dembélé — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dembélé scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Verratti leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Verratti: 87.7, Dembélé: 87.7.
Make your case for Verratti vs Dembélé. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.