Who is better, Ericsson or N. Rosberg?
Marcus Ericsson leads with a GOAT score of 77.8 against 76.9 for Nico Rosberg — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Marcus Ericsson above Nico Rosberg: 77.8 vs 76.9. Marcus Ericsson leads on Peak, Longevity, Statistics. Nico Rosberg leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ericsson wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
N. Rosberg wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/marcus-ericsson-vs-nico-rosberg
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ericsson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Ericsson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 18 | 754 |
| 🇩🇪 N. Rosberg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EricssonActive | N. RosbergRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Indianapolis 500 wins | 1 | — |
| IndyCar wins | 4 | — |
| Formula 1 starts | 97 | — |
| IndyCar podiums | 12 | — |
| Seasons in top-level racing | 12 | — |
| World titles | — | 1 |
| Grand Prix wins | — | 23 |
| Pole positions | — | 30 |
| Podiums | — | 57 |
| Race starts | — | 206 |
| Fastest laps | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Marcus Ericsson leads with a GOAT score of 77.8 against 76.9 for Nico Rosberg — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
N. Rosberg scores higher on dominance, honours. Ericsson leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ericsson: 77.8, N. Rosberg: 76.9.
Make your case for Ericsson vs N. Rosberg. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.