Who is better, Sharapova or Kuznetsova?
Svetlana Kuznetsova leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.2 for Maria Sharapova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Svetlana Kuznetsova above Maria Sharapova: 82.3 vs 82.2. Svetlana Kuznetsova leads on Longevity, Statistics. Maria Sharapova leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kuznetsova wins: Longevity, Statistics
Sharapova wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/maria-sharapova-vs-svetlana-kuznetsova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kuznetsova leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Sharapova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 17 |
| 🇷🇺 Kuznetsova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SharapovaRetired | KuznetsovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 5 | — |
| Career Grand Slams | 1 | — |
| Career titles | 36 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 21 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Tour Finals titles | 1 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 2 |
| WTA titles | — | 18 |
| Fed Cup titles | — | 3 |
| Career-high ranking | — | 2 |
| Career match wins | — | 700 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Svetlana Kuznetsova leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.2 for Maria Sharapova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sharapova scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Kuznetsova leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sharapova: 82.2, Kuznetsova: 82.3.
Make your case for Sharapova vs Kuznetsova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.