Who is better, Juárez or Benítez?
Mariana Juárez leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Wilfredo Benítez — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Mariana Juárez and Wilfredo Benítez level at 86.3. Mariana Juárez leads on Longevity, Statistics. Wilfredo Benítez leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Juárez wins: Longevity, Statistics
Benítez wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/mariana-juarez-vs-wilfredo-benitez
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Juárez leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Juárez | 0 | 0 | 48 | 102 | 300 | 636 |
| 🇵🇷 Benítez | 0 | 0 | 8 | 17 | 35 | 48 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JuárezRetired | BenítezRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles won | 3 | — |
| Professional wins | 56 | 53 |
| Title defences | 12 | — |
| Professional years | 25 | — |
| Weight divisions held titles in | 3 | — |
| World titles in divisions | — | 3 |
| Youngest world champion age | — | 17 |
| Career knockouts | — | 31 |
| Professional bouts | — | 62 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Mariana Juárez leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Wilfredo Benítez — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Benítez scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Juárez leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Juárez: 86.3, Benítez: 86.3.
Make your case for Juárez vs Benítez. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.