Who is better, Pérec or Bagach?
Oleksandr Bagach leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.7 for Marie-José Pérec — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Oleksandr Bagach above Marie-José Pérec: 84.8 vs 84.7. Oleksandr Bagach leads on Longevity. Marie-José Pérec leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bagach wins: Longevity
Pérec wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/marie-jose-perec-vs-oleksandr-bagach
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bagach leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Pérec | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 |
| 🇺🇦 Bagach | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 214 | 605 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PérecRetired | BagachRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | — |
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| 400m best (sec) | 48.25 | — |
| 200m best (sec) | 21.99 | — |
| Olympic doubles | 1 | — |
| World Indoor titles | — | 2 |
| European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Personal best in centimetres | — | 2,135 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Oleksandr Bagach leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.7 for Marie-José Pérec — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pérec scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Bagach leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Pérec: 84.7, Bagach: 84.8.
Make your case for Pérec vs Bagach. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.