Who is better, MaRin or Resolut1on?
Resolut1on leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.5 for Jang "MaRin" Gyeong-hwan — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Resolut1on above Jang "MaRin" Gyeong-hwan: 81.6 vs 81.5. Resolut1on leads on Longevity. Jang "MaRin" Gyeong-hwan leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Resolut1on wins: Longevity
MaRin wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/marin-lol-vs-resolut1on-d2
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Resolut1on leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 MaRin | 0 | 0 | 60 | 134 | 378 | 436 |
| 🇺🇦 Resolut1on | 0 | 0 | 52 | 117 | 374 | 696 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MaRinRetired | Resolut1onActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| World finals MVP awards | 1 | — |
| LCK titles | 2 | — |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | 1 | — |
| Professional seasons | 6 | — |
| TI finals | — | 1 |
| Premier tournament wins | — | 4 |
| TI appearances | — | 6 |
| Career seasons | — | 12 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 87 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Resolut1on leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.5 for Jang "MaRin" Gyeong-hwan — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
MaRin scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Resolut1on leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. MaRin: 81.5, Resolut1on: 81.6.
Make your case for MaRin vs Resolut1on. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.