Who is better, Andretti or Hill?
Mario Andretti leads with a GOAT score of 85.9 against 80.7 for Phil Hill — a gap of 5.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Andretti vs Hill
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mario Andretti above Phil Hill: 85.9 vs 80.7. Mario Andretti leads on Longevity, Dominance, Statistics. Phil Hill leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AndrettiWinner
85.9Andretti wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Hill
80.7Hill wins: Peak
Candidates
Locked to Formula 1Shareable URL · /compare/mario-andretti-vs-phil-hill-f1
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Mario Andretti
85.9
Andretti leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Mario Andretti
2. Phil Hill
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Phil Hill5 seasons played · career day 1,825319 race wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Mario Andretti5 seasons played · career day 3,2873 race wins
-99.1% vs Hill at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Andretti | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 🇺🇸 Hill | 0 | 0 | 25 | 73 | 319 | 475 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Andretti85.9
Hill80.7
FAQ
Where does Hill beat Andretti?
Hill scores higher on peak. Andretti leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
How is the Andretti vs Hill score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Andretti: 85.9, Hill: 80.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Andretti vs Hill. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.