GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Corso vs MacMillan

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CorsoWinner
84.2

Corso wins: Dominance, Longevity

MacMillan
84.2

MacMillan wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/mario-corso-vs-shannon-macmillan-v

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇹 Mario Corso
84.2

Corso leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Mario Corso
84.2
2. Shannon MacMillan
84.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Through age 21 · Goals per season
1. 🇮🇹 Mario Corso21 goals
5 seasons by age 21 · 4.2 per season

Setting the pace at age 21

No verified birth date for MacMillan — shown in the pro-debut view instead.

Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.

MetricCorsoRetiredMacMillanRetired
Serie A goals78—
Italy caps23—
European Cup titles2—
Intercontinental Cup titles2—
Serie A titles4—
World Cup titles—1
Olympic gold medals—1
United States caps—176
United States goals—60
US Player of the Year awards—1
Dominance w25%8480
Peak w20%8688
Longevity w20%8280
Honours w20%8890
Statistics w15%8084

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Corso84.2
MacMillan84.2
The people
Corso
MacMillan

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Corso or MacMillan?

Mario Corso leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Shannon MacMillan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does MacMillan beat Corso?

MacMillan scores higher on peak, honours, statistics. Corso leads on dominance, longevity.

How is the Corso vs MacMillan score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Corso: 84.2, MacMillan: 84.2.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Corso vs MacMillan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →