Who is better, Caldentey or Beardsley?
Mariona Caldentey leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.6 for Peter Beardsley — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Mariona Caldentey and Peter Beardsley level at 82.6. Mariona Caldentey leads on Honours, Statistics. Peter Beardsley leads on Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Caldentey wins: Honours, Statistics
Beardsley wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/mariona-caldentey-vs-peter-beardsley
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Caldentey leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Caldentey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 32 | 83 |
| 🏴 Beardsley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 260 | 602 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CaldenteyActive | BeardsleyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Champions League titles | 3 | — |
| Liga F titles | 7 | — |
| Spain caps | 80 | — |
| Barcelona goals | 100 | — |
| League titles with Liverpool | — | 2 |
| FA Cups | — | 1 |
| England caps | — | 59 |
| Appearances for Newcastle United | — | 321 |
| Goals for Newcastle United | — | 117 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Mariona Caldentey leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.6 for Peter Beardsley — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Beardsley scores higher on dominance, longevity. Caldentey leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Caldentey: 82.6, Beardsley: 82.6.
Make your case for Caldentey vs Beardsley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.