GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Kapp vs Lanning

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KappWinner
88.8

Kapp wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

Lanning
88.7

Lanning wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/marizanne-kapp-vs-meg-lanning

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇿🇦 Marizanne Kapp
88.8

Kapp leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. South Africa's premier all-rounder with more than 300 international wickets.

1. Marizanne Kapp
88.8
2. Meg Lanning
88.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Meg Lanning5 years played · career day 2,190277 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Marizanne Kapp5 years played · career day 1,825116 runs
-58.1% vs Lanning at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇿🇦 Kapp001432116278
🇦🇺 Lanning00045217472

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricKappActiveLanningRetired
International wickets300
ODI wickets150
T20I wickets100
ODI runs2,000
Career best ODI bowling ranking1
World Cup titles7
ODI centuries15
International runs8,352
ODI average53.51
Commonwealth golds1
Wins as captain150
Dominance w25%8688
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%8882
Honours w20%8492
Statistics w15%9490

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Kapp88.8
Lanning88.7
The people
Kapp
Lanning

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Kapp vs Lanning. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →