GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ihatsu vs Grahm

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
IhatsuWinner
78.9

Ihatsu wins: Honours

Grahm
78.2

Grahm wins: Dominance, Peak

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/marja-leena-ihatsu-vs-erika-grahm

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇫🇮 Marja-Leena Ihatsu
78.9

Ihatsu leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic bronze medallist in 1998 and a multiple world championship medallist.

1. Marja-Leena Ihatsu
78.9
2. Erika Grahm
78.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇸🇪 Erika Grahm5 seasons played · career day 2,19189 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇫🇮 Marja-Leena Ihatsu5 seasons played · career day 2,55657 points
-36.0% vs Grahm at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇫🇮 Ihatsu00001880
🇸🇪 Grahm0001042155

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricIhatsuRetiredGrahmRetired
Olympic medals1
World Championship medals5
European titles3
Finnish league titles5
International seasons12
Olympic appearances2
World Championship appearances6
SDHL titles3
Sweden caps120
SDHL points250
Dominance w25%7072
Peak w20%8486
Longevity w20%8080
Honours w20%8072
Statistics w15%8484

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Ihatsu78.9
Grahm78.2
The people
Ihatsu
Grahm

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ihatsu vs Grahm. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →