GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ihatsu vs Gáborík

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GáboríkWinner
79.3

Gáborík wins: Dominance, Peak

Ihatsu
78.9

Ihatsu wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/marja-leena-ihatsu-vs-marian-gaborik

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇰 Marián Gáborík
79.3

Gáborík leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Stanley Cup champion with Los Angeles and a three-time NHL All-Star.

1. Marián Gáborík
79.3
2. Marja-Leena Ihatsu
78.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇸🇰 Marián Gáborík5 seasons played · career day 1,826134 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇫🇮 Marja-Leena Ihatsu5 seasons played · career day 2,55657 points
-57.5% vs Gáborík at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇫🇮 Ihatsu00001880
🇸🇰 Gáborík00184896271

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricIhatsuRetiredGáboríkRetired
Olympic medals1
World Championship medals5
European titles3
Finnish league titles5
International seasons12
Stanley Cups1
NHL goals407
NHL points815
NHL All-Star selections3
NHL games1,035
Dominance w25%7076
Peak w20%8486
Longevity w20%8078
Honours w20%8076
Statistics w15%8482

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Gáborík79.3
Ihatsu78.9
The people
Ihatsu
Gáborík

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ihatsu vs Gáborík. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →