Who is better, Alleyne or Bainbridge?
Phil Bainbridge leads with a GOAT score of 81.7 against 81.6 for Mark Alleyne — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Phil Bainbridge above Mark Alleyne: 81.7 vs 81.6. Phil Bainbridge leads on Dominance, Honours. Mark Alleyne leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bainbridge wins: Dominance, Honours
Alleyne wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/mark-alleyne-vs-phil-bainbridge
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bainbridge leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Alleyne | 0 | 0 | 200 | 650 | 2,950 | 6,870 |
| 🇬🇧 Bainbridge | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 294 | 610 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlleyneRetired | BainbridgeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| First-class runs | 14,498 | 13,656 |
| First-class wickets | 431 | 348 |
| One-day trophies as captain | 6 | — |
| First-class centuries | 22 | 17 |
| Career years | 20 | — |
| Wisden Cricketer of the Year | — | 1 |
| First-class matches | — | 322 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Phil Bainbridge leads with a GOAT score of 81.7 against 81.6 for Mark Alleyne — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Alleyne scores higher on longevity. Bainbridge leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Alleyne: 81.6, Bainbridge: 81.7.
Make your case for Alleyne vs Bainbridge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.