GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Calcavecchia vs Alcott

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CalcavecchiaWinner
84.2

Calcavecchia wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

Alcott
84.1

Alcott wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/mark-calcavecchia-vs-amy-alcott

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Mark Calcavecchia
84.2

Calcavecchia leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Won The Open in 1989 in the first four-hole playoff at Troon.

1. Mark Calcavecchia
84.2
2. Amy Alcott
84.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🇺🇸 Amy Alcott5 seasons played · career day 1,82510 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Mark Calcavecchia5 seasons played · career day 3,6517 wins
-30.0% vs Alcott at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Calcavecchia000006
🇺🇸 Alcott00121022

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCalcavecchiaActiveAlcottRetired
Major championships1
PGA Tour wins13
Ryder Cup appearances4
Champions Tour wins1
Seasons on tour40
Major titles5
LPGA wins29
Hall of Fame inductions1
Vare Trophy wins1
Seasons with a win15
Dominance w25%7678
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%9086
Honours w20%8086
Statistics w15%8884

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Calcavecchia84.2
Alcott84.1
The people
Calcavecchia
Alcott

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Calcavecchia vs Alcott. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →