Who is better, Recchi or Kane?
Mark Recchi leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.7 for Patrick Kane — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Recchi vs Kane
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Mark Recchi and Patrick Kane level at 85.7. Mark Recchi leads on Longevity, Statistics. Patrick Kane leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RecchiWinner
85.7Recchi wins: Longevity, Statistics
Kane
85.7Kane wins: Dominance, Peak
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/mark-recchi-vs-patrick-kane
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Mark Recchi
85.7
Recchi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Mark Recchi
2. Patrick Kane
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Mark Recchi5 seasons played · career day 2,191443 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Patrick Kane5 seasons played · career day 1,825369 points
-16.7% vs Recchi at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Recchi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 213 | 672 |
| 🇺🇸 Kane | 0 | 0 | 72 | 142 | 369 | 663 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Recchi85.7
Kane85.7
FAQ
Where does Kane beat Recchi?
Kane scores higher on peak, dominance. Recchi leads on statistics, longevity.
How is the Recchi vs Kane score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Recchi: 85.7, Kane: 85.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Recchi vs Kane. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.