Who is better, markeloff or Ruler?
Yegor "markeloff" Markelov leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Park "Ruler" Jae-hyuk — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Yegor "markeloff" Markelov and Park "Ruler" Jae-hyuk level at 86.3. Yegor "markeloff" Markelov leads on Peak. Park "Ruler" Jae-hyuk leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →markeloff wins: Peak
Ruler wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/markeloff-cs-vs-ruler-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
markeloff leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇦 markeloff | 0 | 0 | 60 | 134 | 318 | 672 |
| 🇰🇷 Ruler | 0 | 0 | 70 | 166 | 336 | 774 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | markeloffRetired | RulerActive |
|---|---|---|
| World championship titles in 2010 | 3 | — |
| Intel Extreme Masters titles | 2 | — |
| Big event titles | 12 | — |
| ESWC titles | 1 | — |
| Professional seasons | 12 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | — | 1 |
| LCK titles | — | 3 |
| LPL titles | — | 2 |
| World finals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Yegor "markeloff" Markelov leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Park "Ruler" Jae-hyuk — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ruler scores higher on honours, longevity. markeloff leads on peak.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. markeloff: 86.3, Ruler: 86.3.
Make your case for markeloff vs Ruler. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.