GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Vondroušová vs Osaka

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
VondroušováWinner
76.9

Vondroušová wins: Peak, Honours

Osaka
76.5

Osaka wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/marketa-vondrousova-vs-naomi-osaka

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇿 Markéta Vondroušová
76.9

Vondroušová leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. First unseeded woman to win Wimbledon, in 2023.

1. Markéta Vondroušová
76.9
2. Naomi Osaka
76.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇿 Markéta Vondroušová5 seasons played · career day 2,1919 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Naomi Osaka5 seasons played · career day 2,9214 titles
-55.6% vs Vondroušová at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇿 Vondroušová0001615
🇯🇵 Osaka000005

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricVondroušováActiveOsakaActive
Grand Slam singles titles1
Olympic medals1
WTA titles3
Grand Slam finals2
Billie Jean King Cup titles1
Grand Slam titles4
US Open titles2
Australian Open titles2
Weeks at No. 125
Career titles7
Year-end No. 11
Dominance w25%7474
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%6466
Honours w20%7876
Statistics w15%8080

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Vondroušová76.9
Osaka76.5
The people
Vondroušová
Osaka

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Vondroušová vs Osaka. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →