Who is better, Marta or Michels?
Marta Vieira da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 92.2 for Rinus Michels — a gap of 2.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Marta Vieira da Silva above Rinus Michels: 95.0 vs 92.2. Marta Vieira da Silva leads on Longevity, Statistics, Dominance. Rinus Michels leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Marta wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Michels wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/marta-vs-rinus-michels
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Marta leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Michels — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Michels — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | MartaActive | MichelsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| FIFA World Player awards | 6 | — |
| World Cup goals | 17 | — |
| Brazil caps | 200 | — |
| Brazil goals | 119 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| World Cups played | 6 | — |
| European Cups | — | 1 |
| La Liga titles | — | 1 |
| Eredivisie titles | — | 4 |
| UEFA European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Seasons as a manager | — | 28 |
| Dominance w25% | 96 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 97 | 95 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 93 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 90 |
Marta Vieira da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 92.2 for Rinus Michels — a gap of 2.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Michels scores higher on honours. Marta leads on peak, dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Marta: 95.0, Michels: 92.2.
Make your case for Marta vs Michels. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.