Who is better, Marta or Ronaldo?
Cristiano Ronaldo leads with a GOAT score of 95.5 against 95.0 for Marta Vieira da Silva — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cristiano Ronaldo above Marta Vieira da Silva: 95.5 vs 95.0. Cristiano Ronaldo leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Marta Vieira da Silva leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ronaldo wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Marta wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/marta-vs-ronaldo
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ronaldo leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
Ronaldo is -64.0% behind Marta's pace at age 21
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | MartaActive | RonaldoActive · Al-Nassr FC |
|---|---|---|
| FIFA World Player awards | 6 | — |
| World Cup goals | 17 | — |
| Brazil caps | 200 | — |
| Brazil goals | 119 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| World Cups played | 6 | — |
| Career goals | — | 924 |
| Career assists | — | 260 |
| Ballon d'Or | — | 5 |
| World Cups | — | 0 |
| Champions League titles | — | 5 |
| League titles | — | 7 |
| Goals per 90 | — | 0.71 |
| Dominance w25% | 96 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 97 | 95 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 99 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 93 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 97 |
Cristiano Ronaldo leads with a GOAT score of 95.5 against 95.0 for Marta Vieira da Silva — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Marta scores higher on peak, dominance. Ronaldo leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Marta: 95.0, Ronaldo: 95.5.
Make your case for Marta vs Ronaldo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.