Who is better, Marta or Mandas?
Marta Vieira da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 13.4 for Christos Mandas — a gap of 81.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Marta vs Mandas
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Marta Vieira da Silva above Christos Mandas: 95.0 vs 13.4. Marta Vieira da Silva leads on Dominance, Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MartaWinner
95.0Marta wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Mandas
13.4Mandas wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/marta-vs-ros-christos-mandas
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇷 Marta Vieira da Silva
95.0
Marta leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Mandas — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Marta Vieira da Silva
2. Christos Mandas
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇧🇷 Marta Vieira da Silva89 goals
5 seasons by age 21 · 17.8 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Mandas — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Marta95.0
Mandas13.4
FAQ
Where does Mandas beat Marta?
Mandas does not lead any of the five categories; Marta is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Marta vs Mandas score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Marta: 95.0, Mandas: 13.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Marta vs Mandas. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.