Who is better, Marta or Martinelli?
Marta Vieira da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 15.5 for Matheus Martinelli — a gap of 79.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Marta Vieira da Silva above Matheus Martinelli: 95.0 vs 15.5. Marta Vieira da Silva leads on Dominance, Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Marta wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Martinelli wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/marta-vs-ros-matheus-martinelli
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Marta leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Martinelli — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Martinelli — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | MartaActive | MartinelliActive · Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| FIFA World Player awards | 6 | — |
| World Cup goals | 17 | — |
| Brazil caps | 200 | — |
| Brazil goals | 119 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| World Cups played | 6 | — |
| Shirt number | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 96 | 14.6 |
| Peak w20% | 97 | 21.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 12.6 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 10.6 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 18.9 |
Marta Vieira da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 15.5 for Matheus Martinelli — a gap of 79.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Martinelli does not lead any of the five categories; Marta is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Marta: 95.0, Martinelli: 15.5.
Make your case for Marta vs Martinelli. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.