GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Bicknell vs Amiss

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BicknellWinner
85.7

Bicknell wins: Honours

Amiss
85.7

Amiss wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/martin-bicknell-vs-dennis-amiss

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Martin Bicknell
85.7

Bicknell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Took 1,061 first-class wickets and returned to Tests after ten years.

1. Martin Bicknell
85.7
2. Dennis Amiss
85.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Martin Bicknell5 years played · career day 1,825265 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Dennis Amiss5 years played · career day 1,826265 runs
0.0% vs Bicknell at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Bicknell004594265549
🇬🇧 Amiss004594204549

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBicknellRetiredAmissRetired
First-class wickets1,061
County championships won3
Test wickets14
Seasons with 50 wickets15
Seasons played21
First-class centuries102
First-class runs43,423
Test runs3,612
Test centuries11
Highest Test score262
Dominance w25%8080
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%9092
Honours w20%8078
Statistics w15%9494

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Bicknell85.7
Amiss85.7
The people
Bicknell
Amiss

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Bicknell vs Amiss. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →