Who is better, Bicknell or Smith?
Martin Bicknell leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.6 for Steve Smith — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Martin Bicknell above Steve Smith: 85.7 vs 85.6. Martin Bicknell leads on Longevity, Statistics. Steve Smith leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bicknell wins: Longevity, Statistics
Smith wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/martin-bicknell-vs-steve-smith
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bicknell leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Bicknell | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 265 | 549 |
| 🇦🇺 Smith | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 270 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BicknellRetired | SmithActive |
|---|---|---|
| First-class wickets | 1,061 | — |
| County championships won | 3 | — |
| Test wickets | 14 | — |
| Seasons with 50 wickets | 15 | — |
| Seasons played | 21 | — |
| Test runs | — | 10,000 |
| Test centuries | — | 36 |
| Test average | — | 56 |
| World Test Championships | — | 1 |
| World Cups | — | 1 |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 92 |
Martin Bicknell leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.6 for Steve Smith — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Smith scores higher on peak, dominance. Bicknell leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bicknell: 85.7, Smith: 85.6.
Make your case for Bicknell vs Smith. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.