Who is better, Brodeur or Kharlamov?
Martin Brodeur leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 89.9 for Valeri Kharlamov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Martin Brodeur above Valeri Kharlamov: 90.0 vs 89.9. Martin Brodeur leads on Longevity, Statistics. Valeri Kharlamov leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brodeur wins: Longevity, Statistics
Kharlamov wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/martin-brodeur-vs-valeri-kharlamov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brodeur leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Brodeur | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 242 |
| 🇷🇺 Kharlamov | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 330 | 694 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrodeurRetired | KharlamovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career wins | 691 | — |
| Shutouts | 125 | — |
| Stanley Cups | 3 | — |
| Vezina Trophies | 4 | — |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Games played | 1,266 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles | — | 8 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 11 |
| Soviet league goals | — | 293 |
| Soviet Player of the Year awards | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 92 |
Martin Brodeur leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 89.9 for Valeri Kharlamov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kharlamov scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Brodeur leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brodeur: 90.0, Kharlamov: 89.9.
Make your case for Brodeur vs Kharlamov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.