Who is better, Crowe or Dar?
Nida Dar leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.4 for Martin Crowe — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Crowe vs Dar
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nida Dar above Martin Crowe: 84.6 vs 84.4. Nida Dar leads on Longevity, Statistics. Martin Crowe leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DarWinner
84.6Dar wins: Longevity, Statistics
Crowe
84.4Crowe wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/martin-crowe-vs-nida-dar
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇰 Nida Dar
84.6
Dar leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Nida Dar
2. Martin Crowe
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇿 Martin Crowe5 years played · career day 1,825243 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇰 Nida Dar5 years played · career day 1,82598 runs
-59.7% vs Crowe at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Crowe | 0 | 0 | 35 | 77 | 243 | 559 |
| 🇵🇰 Dar | 0 | 0 | 10 | 26 | 98 | 234 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Dar84.6
Crowe84.4
FAQ
Where does Crowe beat Dar?
Crowe scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Dar leads on statistics, longevity.
How is the Crowe vs Dar score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Crowe: 84.4, Dar: 84.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Crowe vs Dar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.