Who is better, Crowe or Blunt?
Martin Crowe leads with a GOAT score of 84.4 against 84.4 for Roger Blunt — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Crowe vs Blunt
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Martin Crowe and Roger Blunt level at 84.4. Martin Crowe leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Roger Blunt leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CroweWinner
84.4Crowe wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Blunt
84.4Blunt wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/martin-crowe-vs-roger-blunt
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇿 Martin Crowe
84.4
Crowe leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Martin Crowe
2. Roger Blunt
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇿 Roger Blunt5 years played · career day 1,825293 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇿 Martin Crowe5 years played · career day 1,825243 runs
-17.1% vs Blunt at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Crowe | 0 | 0 | 35 | 77 | 243 | 559 |
| 🇳🇿 Blunt | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 293 | 605 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Crowe84.4
Blunt84.4
FAQ
Where does Blunt beat Crowe?
Blunt scores higher on honours, longevity. Crowe leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Crowe vs Blunt score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Crowe: 84.4, Blunt: 84.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Crowe vs Blunt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.