GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Donnelly vs Brookes

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DonnellyWinner
83.1

Donnelly wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Brookes
83.1

Brookes wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/martin-donnelly-vs-dennis-brookes

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇿 Martin Donnelly
83.1

Donnelly leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. One of five cricketers to score a hundred at Lord's in a Test, varsity match and Gentlemen v Players.

1. Martin Donnelly
83.1
2. Dennis Brookes
83.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇳🇿 Martin Donnelly5 years played · career day 1,826288 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Dennis Brookes5 years played · career day 1,825258 runs
-10.4% vs Donnelly at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇳🇿 Donnelly004596218631
🇬🇧 Brookes004593258526

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDonnellyRetiredBrookesRetired
Test average52
Highest Test score206
First-class runs9,25028,980
First-class centuries2371
Tests played71
Seasons played25
Highest score257
Dominance w25%8076
Peak w20%9286
Longevity w20%7892
Honours w20%7872
Statistics w15%9094

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Donnelly83.1
Brookes83.1
The people
Donnelly
Brookes

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Donnelly vs Brookes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →