Who is better, Navratilova or Gonzales?
Martina Navratilova leads with a GOAT score of 95.1 against 92.9 for Pancho Gonzales — a gap of 2.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Martina Navratilova above Pancho Gonzales: 95.1 vs 92.9. Martina Navratilova leads on Honours, Longevity, Dominance. Pancho Gonzales leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Navratilova wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Gonzales wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/martina-navratilova-vs-pancho-gonzales
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Navratilova leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Gonzales — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | NavratilovaRetired | GonzalesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 18 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 31 | — |
| Career singles titles | 167 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 332 | — |
| Match win % | 90.1% | — |
| Wimbledon titles | 9 | — |
| Amateur Grand Slam titles | — | 2 |
| World professional titles | — | 8 |
| Pro tour tournament wins | — | 113 |
| US Pro titles | — | 8 |
| Career span in years | — | 27 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 97 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 93 | 92 |
Martina Navratilova leads with a GOAT score of 95.1 against 92.9 for Pancho Gonzales — a gap of 2.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gonzales scores higher on peak. Navratilova leads on dominance, honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Navratilova: 95.1, Gonzales: 92.9.
Make your case for Navratilova vs Gonzales. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.