Who is better, Anderson or Aldama?
Yamilé Aldama leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 79.9 for Marvin Anderson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yamilé Aldama above Marvin Anderson: 80.1 vs 79.9. Yamilé Aldama leads on Longevity. Marvin Anderson leads on Statistics, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Aldama wins: Longevity
Anderson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/marvin-anderson-athletics-vs-yamile-aldama
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Aldama leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇲 Anderson | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 356 | 636 |
| 🇬🇧 Aldama | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 310 | 654 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AndersonRetired | AldamaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Personal best 200 m (s) | 20.06 | — |
| NCAA All-America honours | 3 | — |
| Jamaican championship medals | 3 | — |
| World indoor titles | — | 1 |
| Personal best (m) | — | 15.29 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 4 |
| World Championship finals | — | 6 |
| Years at the top level | — | 21 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Yamilé Aldama leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 79.9 for Marvin Anderson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Anderson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Aldama leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anderson: 79.9, Aldama: 80.1.
Make your case for Anderson vs Aldama. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.