Who is better, Kom or Tendulkar?
Sachin Tendulkar leads with a cross-sport score of 88.7 against 86.9 for Mary Kom — a gap of 1.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sachin Tendulkar above Mary Kom: 88.7 vs 86.9. Sachin Tendulkar leads on Longevity, Statistics, Dominance. Mary Kom leads on Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Tendulkar wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Kom wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/mary-kom-vs-tendulkar
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
94.4 in-sport × 0.94 Global participation & competition depth
Tendulkar leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Kom — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | KomActive | TendulkarRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 93 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 100 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 98 |
| World Championship golds | 6 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Asian Championship golds | 5 | — |
| Commonwealth golds | 1 | — |
| Asian Games golds | 1 | — |
| Test batting average | — | 53.78 |
| International centuries | — | 100 |
| Test runs | — | 15,921 |
| ODI runs | — | 18,426 |
| World Cups | — | 1 |
| Tests played | — | 200 |
Sachin Tendulkar leads with a cross-sport score of 88.7 against 86.9 for Mary Kom — a gap of 1.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kom scores higher on peak, honours. Tendulkar leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
Each in-sport GOAT score is multiplied by Competition Depth: Kom 0.96 (boxing) and Tendulkar 0.94 (cricket). Deeper, more global sports keep more of their score.
Make your case for Kom vs Tendulkar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.