Who is better, Bekh-Romanchuk or Warholm?
Karsten Warholm leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.6 for Maryna Bekh-Romanchuk — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Karsten Warholm above Maryna Bekh-Romanchuk: 84.7 vs 84.6. Karsten Warholm leads on Dominance, Peak. Maryna Bekh-Romanchuk leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Warholm wins: Dominance, Peak
Bekh-Romanchuk wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/maryna-bekh-romanchuk-vs-warholm
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Warholm leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Bekh-Romanchuk — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | Bekh-RomanchukActive | WarholmActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| European titles | 1 | 3 |
| Long jump best | 6.93 | — |
| Triple jump best | 15.02 | — |
| World indoor medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World golds | — | 3 |
| World records | — | 2 |
| 400mH best (s) | — | 45.94 |
| Diamond League titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 95 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteKarsten Warholm leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.6 for Maryna Bekh-Romanchuk — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bekh-Romanchuk scores higher on statistics, longevity. Warholm leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bekh-Romanchuk: 84.6, Warholm: 84.7.
Make your case for Bekh-Romanchuk vs Warholm. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.