Who is better, Tanaka or Clemente?
Masahiro Tanaka leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.4 for Roberto Clemente — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Masahiro Tanaka above Roberto Clemente: 87.5 vs 87.4. Masahiro Tanaka leads on Peak, Statistics. Roberto Clemente leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Tanaka wins: Peak, Statistics
Clemente wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/masahiro-tanaka-vs-roberto-clemente
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Tanaka leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Tanaka | 0 | 0 | 11 | 20 | 65 | 124 |
| 🇵🇷 Clemente | 0 | 0 | 0.255 | 0.566 | 1.404 | 2.701 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TanakaActive | ClementeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NPB MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Wins in 2013 | 24 | — |
| MLB wins | 78 | — |
| MLB All-Star selections | 2 | — |
| Japan Series titles | 1 | — |
| Career hits | — | 3,000 |
| Gold Gloves | — | 12 |
| MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Batting titles | — | 4 |
| World Series titles | — | 2 |
| World Series MVP | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Masahiro Tanaka leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.4 for Roberto Clemente — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Clemente scores higher on dominance, honours. Tanaka leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Tanaka: 87.5, Clemente: 87.4.
Make your case for Tanaka vs Clemente. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.