GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Mashrafe vs Wyatt-Hodge

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MashrafeWinner
83.7

Mashrafe wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics

Wyatt-Hodge
83.7

Wyatt-Hodge wins: Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/mashrafe-mortaza-vs-danni-wyatt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇩 Mashrafe Mortaza
83.7

Mashrafe leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Bangladesh's most successful ODI captain and leading pace bowler.

1. Mashrafe Mortaza
83.7
2. Danni Wyatt-Hodge
83.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Danni Wyatt-Hodge5 years played · career day 1,825144 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇩 Mashrafe Mortaza5 years played · career day 2,190114 runs
-20.8% vs Wyatt-Hodge at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇧🇩 Mashrafe0001282216
🇬🇧 Wyatt-Hodge001842144326

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMashrafeRetiredWyatt-HodgeActive
ODI wickets270
ODI wins as captain50
Test wickets78
ODI matches220
International seasons1915
T20 World Cup titles1
T20I runs3,000
T20I centuries2
ODI runs1,500
Dominance w25%7876
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%8886
Honours w20%7682
Statistics w15%9290

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Mashrafe83.7
Wyatt-Hodge83.7
The people
Mashrafe
Wyatt-Hodge

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Mashrafe vs Wyatt-Hodge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →