Who is better, Mata or Wunder?
Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.7 for Wunder — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Mata vs Wunder
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong and Wunder level at 84.7. Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong leads on Peak. Wunder leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MataWinner
84.7Mata wins: Peak
Wunder
84.7Wunder wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to EsportsShareable URL · /compare/mata-lol-vs-wunder-lol
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong
84.7
Mata leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong
2. Wunder
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇰🇷 Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong5 split years played · career day 1,826390 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇩🇰 Wunder5 split years played · career day 1,825368 trophies
-5.6% vs Mata at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Mata | 0 | 0 | 58 | 130 | 310 | 660 |
| 🇩🇰 Wunder | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 368 | 644 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Mata84.7
Wunder84.7
FAQ
Where does Wunder beat Mata?
Wunder scores higher on longevity. Mata leads on peak.
How is the Mata vs Wunder score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mata: 84.7, Wunder: 84.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Mata vs Wunder. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.